Component Definition
Definition of system components and their control implementations according to the OSCAL model
Purpose
Document the specific implementation of security controls in each system component, supporting traceability between abstract controls and their technical realization.
DivisionCero System Architecture
High-Level View
Components and Implementations
1. Web Application Component
Description: Frontend application built with Next.js
Responsibility: User interface and customer experience
Technology: Next.js 15.4.2 + React 19.1.0
Implemented Controls:
CAP-001: Secure Development
- Implementation:
- Content Security Policy (CSP) configured
- Input validation through Zod schemas
- XSS protection enabled
- HTTPS enforcement
- Evidence:
next.config.jswith security headers- Form validation with sanitization
- Automated dependency audits
CIP-001: Identity Management
- Implementation:
- NextAuth.js for authentication
- OAuth 2.0 with external providers
- Secure session management
- JWT with token rotation
- Evidence:
- Multi-provider authentication configuration
- Tokens with configured expiration
- Secure logout implemented
2. API Gateway Component
Description: API gateway implemented with Kong
Responsibility: Routing, authentication and rate limiting
Technology: Kong Gateway + OAuth 2.0
Implemented Controls:
CAP-002: API Management
- Implementation:
- Rate limiting per client/endpoint
- API key authentication
- Request/response transformation
- Logging of all transactions
- Evidence:
- Rate limiting policy configuration
- API access logs
- OpenAPI 3.0 documentation
ADR-001: Continuous Monitoring
- Implementation:
- Exported performance metrics
- Alerts on traffic anomalies
- Centralized logs in the ELK Stack
- Evidence:
- Configured Grafana dashboard
- Alerts in Prometheus
- Event correlation in the SIEM
3. Core Business Logic Component
Description: Main business logic
Responsibility: Transaction processing and business rules
Technology: Node.js + TypeScript + Prisma
Implemented Controls:
- Implementation:
- Schemas with classification labels
- Data separated by sensitivity
- Classification-based access
- Evidence:
- Data models with metadata
- Queries with classification filters
- Audit trails by data type
DIA-002: Data Encryption
- Implementation:
- Encryption in transit (TLS 1.3)
- Encryption at rest (AES-256)
- Automated key rotation
- Evidence:
- Valid TLS certificates
- Database encryption configuration
- Key rotation logs
4. Database Component
Description: Main PostgreSQL database
Responsibility: Data persistence
Technology: PostgreSQL 15 + pgcrypto
Implemented Controls:
CIF-001: System Hardening
- Implementation:
- Configuration according to the CIS Benchmark
- Minimal users and permissions
- Access auditing enabled
- Evidence:
- postgresql.conf configuration
- Documented roles and permissions
- Configured audit logs
CCN-001: Continuity Plan
- Implementation:
- Master-slave replication
- Automatic daily backups
- Point-in-time recovery (PITR)
- Evidence:
- Automated backup scripts
- Documented restore tests
- Defined and tested RTO/RPO
5. Kubernetes Cluster Component
Description: Container orchestrator
Responsibility: Service deployment and management
Technology: Kubernetes 1.28 + Helm
Implemented Controls:
CIF-002: Patch Management
- Implementation:
- Automated patching with Argo CD
- Image vulnerability scanning
- Rolling updates without downtime
- Evidence:
- Automatic update pipeline
- Trivy scanner reports
- Deployment history
CIP-002: Endpoint Protection
- Implementation:
- Network Policies configured
- Pod Security Standards enforced
- Runtime security with Falco
- Evidence:
- Documented network policies
- Configured Falco alerts
- Defined security contexts
6. SIEM Component
Description: Security Information and Event Management
Responsibility: Correlation and analysis of security events
Technology: Elastic Stack (ELK) + Wazuh
Implemented Controls:
ADR-001: Continuous Monitoring
- Implementation:
- Log ingestion from all components
- Automated event correlation
- Real-time dashboards
- Alerts through ML anomaly detection
- Evidence:
- Logstash pipeline configuration
- Correlation rules in Wazuh
- 24/7 operational dashboard
ADR-002: Incident Response Plan
- Implementation:
- Automated playbooks
- Automatic alert escalation
- Forensics capabilities
- Evidence:
- SOAR integration configured
- Escalation procedures
- Forensic tools available
7. IAM Component
Description: Identity and Access Management
Responsibility: Authentication and authorization
Technology: Keycloak + LDAP
Implemented Controls:
CIP-001: Identity Management
- Implementation:
- Corporate Single Sign-On (SSO)
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
- Automated provisioning/deprovisioning
- Evidence:
- MFA policy configuration
- Documented RBAC matrices
- Automatic provisioning scripts
THP-001: Security Training
- Implementation:
- Training completion tracking
- Conditional access based on training
- Compliance reports per user
- Evidence:
- LMS integration configured
- Conditional access policies
- Compliance dashboards
Traceability Matrix
Controls vs. Components
| Control | Web App | API GW | Core Logic | Database | K8s | SIEM | IAM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COR-001 | ➖ | ➖ | ✅ | ➖ | ➖ | ✅ | ✅ |
| ADR-001 | ⚠️ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ⚠️ |
| ADR-002 | ➖ | ⚠️ | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ | ✅ | ➖ |
| CAP-001 | ✅ | ➖ | ✅ | ➖ | ⚠️ | ➖ | ➖ |
| CAP-002 | ➖ | ✅ | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ | ⚠️ | ➖ |
| CCN-001 | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ | ✅ | ✅ | ➖ | ➖ |
| CIF-001 | ➖ | ⚠️ | ➖ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ |
| CIF-002 | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ➖ | ⚠️ |
| CIP-001 | ✅ | ⚠️ | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ | ✅ |
| CIP-002 | ⚠️ | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ➖ |
| DIA-001 | ➖ | ➖ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ |
| DIA-002 | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ➖ | ➖ |
| THP-001 | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ | ➖ | ✅ |
Legend:
✅ = Fully implemented
⚠️ = Partially implemented
➖ = Not applicable/Not implemented
Dependencies and Integrations
External Dependencies
- OAuth Providers: Google, Microsoft, GitHub
- Certificate Authority: Let's Encrypt + Internal PKI
- DNS Provider: Cloudflare
- Monitoring: Datadog APM
Security Integrations
- Vulnerability Scanners: Snyk, Trivy
- SAST/DAST: SonarQube, OWASP ZAP
- Secret Management: HashiCorp Vault
- Backup Services: AWS S3 + Glacier
Configuration Management
Configuration as Code
- Infrastructure: Terraform + Ansible
- Applications: Helm Charts + Kustomize
- Security Policies: Open Policy Agent (OPA)
- CI/CD: GitLab CI/CD + ArgoCD
Change Management
- Git Flow: Feature branches with security reviews
- Approval Process: Automated + manual gates
- Rollback Strategy: Automated rollback triggers
- Testing: Security tests in staging
Metrics and Monitoring
Security KPIs by Component
- Availability: 99.9% uptime SLA
- Performance: p95 < 200ms response time
- Security: 0 critical vulnerabilities in production
- Compliance: 100% of critical controls implemented
Critical Alerts
- Security incidents: Automatic detection + escalation
- Performance degradation: Auto-scaling triggers
- Compliance violations: Immediate alerts to the CISO
Kudo Component Definition v1.0 - Document generated according to OSCAL standards
System: DivisionCero Platform | Last updated: 2024